Here’s another interesting video. If you are in any way involved with website design, development, or management, you spend a lot of time looking at other successful websites in an attempt to discover what works well. During this process you’ll often contemplate what drove certain decisions. Therefore it’s very intriguing when you get a chance to hear an actual Q&A about such topics. So, check out this press demo from Facebook:
Found via: Mashable
Below is a quick comparison of two browser testing tools. There are others out there, feel free to add in comments. However, since Adobe just made another press push for BrowserLab I thought it would be a good time to compare these two tools that I’ve been trying out.
Litmus
Litmus is out of the UK, and has been around in some capacity since 2005. They currently offer both an HTML-based web application, as well as a nascent desktop application counterpart.
Browsers supported at this time:
- Short answer - Litmus wins here big time with a very broad list of browsers on both Windows and Mac. Full list here.
Stand out features:
- Not just web browser testing, but also Email Testing - a feature Adobe doesn’t have at all
- Browser tests can show both: Cropped, in-browser window; and Full page no browser window bordering image
- Save multiple tests
- Retesting / test history, iterative workflow
- Validation warnings and direct links to validation results
- Ability to download test results
- Ability to mark a test as complied and share the results (ie Social features)
- bookmarkelt lets you test any page you are visiting in your normal browser
- Rich Help and other resources
Adobe® BrowserLab
Adobe BrowserLab is in a limited time preview stage, this Flash-in-browser-based tool covers the website basics that Litmus does and has a few slick features. One immediate ‘weakness’ in comparison is that at the moment you can only run one test at a time and there is no apparent way to access test history.
Browsers supported at this time:
- Firefox 2.0 & 3.0 for both Win XP and Mac OSX
- IE 6.0 & 7.0 for XP
- Safari 3.0 for Mac
Stand out features:
- Views: single browser, 2-up for comparison, and a very cool “Onion Skin View” that overlays two different captures to show where layout diverges.
- Browser sets, with controls
- Zooming on captures
- BrowserLab Extension for Dreamweaver CS4
Verdict
IMO, Litmus offers a broader more user-friendly set of features for testing multiple sites in an iterative fashion. It’s huge browser library and additional support for testing HTML Email give it a clear edge. Adobe may be able to catch up of course, but I also feel that it will ultimately come down to pricing. Both offer free options, but at the moment Adobe allows you to test IE 6 for free, whereas Litmus requires a paid plan to gain access to anything but IE 7 and Firefox 2.0. Adobe has not set pricing, but has stated that it will become a paid service after it moves out of preview release. We’ll have to see how the pricing packages compare. For the time being, you could benefit by using both in tandem, which I’ll likely do for a while until I feel there’s reason not to. No matter what, the advent of powerful browser-based browser testing tools is a huge time, money, and headache saver for website builders concerned with providing the best user experience possible across a large spectrum of web clients.
Twittermaven recently surveyed 240 people with 6 questions regarding interacting with brands. Here are some key findings, as well as a sample chart.
- Most users (89%) agree that brands should engage their customers on Twitter.
- almost 90% of users would frown upon poor or inappropriate brand use of Twitter.
- 60% of respondents would recommend a company based on their presence on Twitter and 80% of Twitter users will reward those brands
- More than 60% of respondents have 100+ followers and almost 50% of respondents have posted more than 1000 Tweets
For the full results, including a number of other interesting charts, read the article.
Business of Software conference September 2008: Jason Fried is founder of 37signals (developers of Basecamp and Ruby on Rails) and Signal vs Noise blogger
Feel the need to track some tweets? Get your twitter analytics fix, by using these handy web-based tools…
- Twitter Grader gives you a grade based on the power of your Twitter profile.
- Twinfulence: a simple tool using the Twitter API to to measure the combined influence of twitterers and their followers, with a few social network statistics thrown in as bonus.
- TweetStats helps you graph your Twitter Stats including: Tweets per hour; Tweets per month; Tweet timeline; Reply statistics
- TwitGraph analyzes your tweets and presents the data in pie-chart form
- Twitstat - Real time Twitter Analytics
- Twitter Quotient will get your Twitter stats (# friends, #updates) and calculate your Twitter profile standing
- Twist - see trends in twitter in comparison line chart format
- Tweetrush is a service that aims to provide estimated stats on Twitter usage over a period of time via many attractive bar charts
- Twitter meter let’s you query an index of all the words that have been sent to twitter’s public timeline (since late 2007) and plot the number of times that word was used over time.
- TweetVolume is a useful tool for tracking the usage volume, of specific keywords or phrases, in the twit-osphere